Schleswig-Holstein 14 (13.8) 5.
A regulation expired here, according to which older people could get unemployment benefits more easily and were not considered unemployed. In 2011, more than one in six went out of unemployment and retired. Share of the population at risk of poverty, in percent and by federal state: Source: Federal Statistical Office Source: ntv.de, bdk / dpa “An allotment garden in front of the industrial backdrop of August -Thyssen-Hütte in Duisburg-Hamborn. (Photo: picture alliance / dpa) The west is rich, the east poor – for years this was the rule of thumb. But in 2013 a more differentiated picture emerges. The poverty region number one lies precisely in the former “coal pot “of the republic. Timing is one of those things.
Five days before Christmas, Nikolaus Schneider, the managing director of the Paritätischer Wohlfahrtsverband, climbed the steps to the federal press conference. He, who is regarded as something like the country’s social conscience, has no good news in his luggage. “Sadly, Germany has a new poverty record,” Schneider would announce a few minutes later. Baden-Württemberg 11.1% (2011: 11.2) 2. Bavaria 11.2 (11.3) 3. Hesse 13.2 (12.7) 4.
Schleswig-Holstein 14 (13.8) 5. Rhineland-Palatinate 14.6 (15.1) 6. Hamburg 14.8 (14.7) 7. Saarland 15.8 (15.6) 8. Lower Saxony 16 (15.7) 9.
North Rhine-Westphalia 16.6 (16.6) 10. Thuringia 16.9 (16.7) 11. Brandenburg 18.3 (16.9) 12.
Saxony 18.9 (19.6) 13. Saxony-Anhalt 20.9 (20.5) 14. Berlin 21.2 (21.1) 15.
Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania 22.9 (22.2) 16. Bremen 23.1 (22.3) Source: Federal and State Statistical Offices The poverty report that Schneider’s Association publishes annually together with the National Poverty Conference takes no account of political sensitivities or the Christmas idyll, which is characterized by cinnamon stars and gingerbread the republic. Because Schneider paints a sober picture of a republic whose social imbalance is becoming more and more dramatic. The meanwhile third report feeds on the data of the microcensus from 2005 to 2012. Here, those who have less than 60 percent of the average income are considered poor. For a single household this is currently 869 euros, for a couple with two children 1826 euros.
Although the economy and the labor market are recovering, one in seven Germans lives at or below the poverty line – more than ever before. The poverty rate of 15.2 percent is “not a slip-up,” emphasizes Schneider. Since 2006, when it was still 14 percent, poverty has risen continuously. “One has to speak of a trend now,” he says, “that worries us.” Schneider sees the poverty and wealth report of the federal government, which was published in the spring, clearly refuted. In their investigation, the Union and FDP came to the conclusion that the trend in poverty is constant and that the social gap is even closing.university biology essay writing service
The report was criticized at the time because Economics Minister Philipp Rösler had several passages deleted. The charity also raised the charge of whitewashing. Schneider points out that the federal government was based on the relatively good figures from 2010. With the help of the two years more current data, Schneider identifies the following trends: He sees a growing gap between urban and rural regions. The main reason why the poverty rate rose by only 0.1 percentage points compared to the previous year was that it was stopped or even decreased in the most populous states of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg. Nonetheless, inequality is increasing.
Baden-Württemberg (11.1 percent) and Bremen (23.1), the states with the lowest and highest rates, are now separated by 12 percent. In the previous year it was one percentage point less. 1. Munich 11.4 percent (2005: 10.9) 2. Stuttgart 13.4 (13) 3. Hamburg 14.8 (15.7) 4.
Frankfurt am Main 15.2 (13.7) 5. Nuremberg 17.5 (18.1) … 11. Bremen 22.3 (21.4) 12th
Hanover 22.4 (21) 13. Duisburg 25.1 (17) 14. Leipzig 25.9 (23.9) 15. Dortmund 26.4 (18.6) Schneider can hardly report any positive news this year. If at all, then such: In Berlin and North Rhine-Westphalia the rate either rose only slightly or it stagnated.
Promising trends from previous years did not continue. Poverty rose in Thuringia, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Brandenburg after having mostly fallen in previous years. “The number one problem region”, as Schneider calls it, “is and will remain” the Ruhr area. Nowhere did poverty rise as much as in Germany’s largest metropolitan area. The development of the city of Dortmund, where poverty has increased by more than 40 percent since 2005, is exemplary and particularly serious.
No major city in Germany is currently worse off. Leipzig (25.9) and Duisburg (25.1) follow Dortmund, which has 26.4 percent. “Regional turmoil”, “social desolation”, “downward spiral” and “vicious circle” – Schneider’s judgment is drastic. Only – what can be done against poverty? “Those who grow up in poverty have poorer educational opportunities, greater health problems and are permanently left behind. Once poor, always poor,” says Joachim Speicher, spokesman for the National Poverty Conference.
Together with the Paritätischer Wohlfahrtsverband, he makes demands on politics. Debt municipalities should therefore be given targeted support. A solidarity fund, for example, could contribute to this. The social associations are not very satisfied with the new federal government. Speicher and Schneider rate the planned introduction of the minimum wage and the restriction of temporary work as positive, but from their point of view the coalition agreement leaves too many questions unanswered. For example, the improvement of all-day care and the increase in Bafögs as well as social programs for the 450,000 long-term unemployed. “Some of these points were initially in the coalition agreement, but were thrown out again,” says Schneider. However, he sees the greatest omission in another point. “Anyone who wants to fight poverty cannot avoid tax increases.” Schneider believes that the fact that these were declared a taboo right at the beginning of the coalition negotiations is the “birth defect of the new federal government”.
The most effective tool against poverty is the higher taxation of the rich. Because that “hurts the least”. Source: ntv.de “Has to take criticism: FDP boss Christian Lindner. (Photo: picture alliance / Wolfgang Kumm) At the party conference in Berlin, FDP boss Lindner also speaks about immigration. He was then accused of racism, and one party member even declared his resignation.
Lindner cannot understand the anger at all. FDP leader Christian Lindner is infected with comments about migrants in Germany. “You can’t tell in line at the bakery if someone orders a bread roll in broken German, whether it’s the highly qualified developer of artificial intelligence from India or actually a foreigner who is illegally staying with us, at most tolerated,” said Lindner in his speech at the FDP party congress on Saturday. “So that society is pacified, (…) everyone has to be sure that everyone who is with us is also staying with us legally,” emphasized Lindner. Ensuring this is the task of a “demanding, liberal immigration policy based on the rule of law”. Chris Pyak, who is also active in the European liberal party umbrella organization Alde, reacted promptly. “I have just left the FDP,” he announced on Twitter. “In his speech, Christian Lindner gave all Nazis an excuse to harass dark-skinned people.” Pyak sparked a broad discussion on the Internet. Many users criticized Lindner for his statement, including Ulrich Schneider, the managing director of the German Paritätischer Wohlfahrtsverband. “I do not know whether Christian Lindner has crossed the line to racism with this speech at the federal party congress of the FDP. If not, he is close to this line,” tweeted Schneider. Lindner reacted indignantly. “That is really a disgusting allegation from you. The message is completely different: If people can rely on the rule of law, then they can accept diversity – that pacifies.” Schneider, who is on two terms with Lindner, urged the FDP boss to admit that he had galloped. Lindner spoke up again on Sunday and commented on the allegations in a video message. “Anyone who wants to read racism or right-wing populism in my statements is a bit hysterical.
I believe that debates like this have to be conducted more soberly and sensibly, “he demanded. The basis of his statements was a real situation that an immigrant acquaintance described to him, who observed resentment and fears in his environment No problem in terms of content. Bundestag parliamentary group leader Alice Weidel accused Lindner, however, of paying lip service to his concerns about the current immigration and asylum policy. So far, the FDP has consistently refused every request by the AfD that wants to restore the rule of law in Germany. “We would like to invite the FDP to follow up on their words with deeds,” said Weidel. Source: ntv.de, cro / dpa “(Photo: picture alliance / dpa) The risk of impoverishment in Germany has been increasing dramatically for years .
This is shown by the poverty report of the parity welfare association. And it is no longer just the people in the eastern German states that are affected: the Paritätischer Wohlfahrtsverband is calling for an immediate program to combat poverty in Germany. The “at-risk-of-poverty rate” has risen steadily since 2006 and reached a new high in 2011 of 15.1 percent.
With Bremen, a West German federal state lands in last place for the first time in the country ranking. There the rate is 22.3 percent. At 19.5 percent, the rate in eastern Germany is still significantly higher than in the west of 14.0 percent. According to the report, Berlin is one of the particularly problem regions in addition to Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. The most clearly negative trend can be seen in North Rhine-Westphalia and especially in the cities of the Ruhr area. Since 2006, the risk of poverty in some Ruhr cities has increased by 24 to 57 percent due to the structural change in the economy.
Nationwide, the increase was 0.6 percentage points. The general manager of the association, Ulrich Schneider, spoke of a “poverty-related landslide” in the Ruhr area. Anyone whose income is less than 60 percent of the average is considered to be at risk of poverty. In 2011, for example, the poverty threshold of a family of four was 1781 euros per month – and thus higher than the Hartz IV standard rate.
According to the association’s regional evaluation, far fewer people are affected by poverty in Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg than in the rest of the republic. Bremen 2011: 22.3 percent (2010: 21.1) 2nd Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania 22.2 (22.4) 3rd Berlin 21.1 (19.2) 4.
Saxony-Anhalt 20.5 (19.8) 5. Saxony 19.6 (19.4) 6. Brandenburg 16.9 (16.3) 7. Thuringia 16.7 (17.6) NRW 16.7 (15.4) 9. Lower Saxony 15.7 (15.3) 10.
Saarland 15.6 (14.3) 11. Rhineland-Palatinate 15.1 (14.8) 12. Hamburg 14.7 (13.3) 13. Schleswig-Holstein 13.8 (13.8) 14.
Hesse 12.7 (12.1) 15. Bavaria 11.3 (10.8) 16. Baden-Württemberg 11.2 (11) The Paritätische Gesamtverband made the federal government jointly responsible for the growing poverty in Germany. “This development is also politically caused,” said Schneider. He criticized a “tax policy redistribution from the bottom up” and the reduction of publicly funded employment.
A number of austerity measures such as the cancellation of the parental allowance for Hartz IV recipients and the energy cost component of the housing benefit also had a poverty-increasing effect. In Schneider’s sense, the required immediate program should include a statutory minimum wage, minimum pensions and minimum unemployment benefit I. He also considers the expansion of publicly funded employment, the increase in the Hartz IV standard rates and a reform of housing benefits to be necessary. These measures would “first” cost between ten and 20 billion euros, said Schneider. This is a lot of money, but “we have the money,” he added, referring to around 4.8 trillion euros in the accounts of German private households. According to the welfare association, the immediate measures must be supplemented by long-term structural policy measures, especially in the Education and youth welfare. According to the association, the situation in Germany has shifted from a relatively constant risk of poverty to a significant increase since 2011 at the latest. On the basis of the data from last year, “a clear upward trend” must be established in a multi-year comparison – despite falling unemployment rates.
According to Schneider, this is an indication of the problem of inadequate employment. He spoke of “an Americanization of the labor market”, which had been “consciously pushed” by politicians. SPD leader Sigmar Gabriel said in Berlin that the new data showed “how cynical and lying the ‘everything is good’ rhetoric of the people Coalition is “. “The policy of the Merkel government is deepening the social division in Germany more and more quickly,” criticized left parliamentary group leader Gregor Gysi. Federal Labor Minister Ursula von der Leyen, on the other hand, does not consider the development of poverty in Germany to be alarming. “One should neither dramatize the problems nor downplay them. In a rich country like Germany, poverty is relative,” said the CDU politician. “By far the greatest risk of poverty in Germany is unemployment.
The data are such that long-term unemployment has fallen by 40 percent since 2007, that we have the lowest youth unemployment in Europe. “In addition, child poverty has declined and there are significantly fewer children in Hartz IV. The programs for unemployed single parents have also had an impact “That shows that we are on the right track.” The CSU social expert Max Straubinger also spoke of a “completely exaggerated representation” by the charity. Source: ntv.de, dpa / AFP “The pensions are likely to rise somewhat in 2015 – the Contribution rate will probably decrease. So is old-age insurance in solid waters? No, says the Paritätische Gesamtverband.
More and more people are threatened with a pension below the level of the basic security. The Paritätische Gesamtverband [Paritätische Gesamtverband] demands that the pension should be 50 percent of the average income. “For years, the strategy has been to keep the contribution rate stable in any case,” said the association’s managing director, Ulrich Schneider. “That strategy failed.” Today the German pension insurance wants to give an overview of the financial situation of the pension fund.